THE VINTEUIL SONATA
The year before, at an evening party, he had heard a piece of music played...that had opened
and expanded his soul, as the fragrance of certain roses, wafted upon the moist air of evening,
has the power of dilating one's nostrils...It had at once suggested to him a world of
inexpressible delights, of whose existence, before hearing it, he had never dreamed...With a
slow and rhythmical movement it led him first this way, then that, toward of state of happiness
that was noble, unintelligible yet precise...And then suddenly...it changed direction, and, in a
fresh movement, more rapid, fragile, melancholy, incessant, sweet, it bore him off with it towards
new vistas...He was like a man into whose life a woman he has seen for a moment passing by has
brought the image of a new beauty which deepens his own sensibility, although he does not
even know her name, or whether he will ever see her again...
The above excerpt, as everyone knows (or ought to) comes from Swan's Way, the first
section of Marcel Proust's A la Recherche du Temps Peru, rendered by the original English
translator, C. K. Scott Moncrieff (with a grace and felicity proportionate to its inaccuracy) as
Remembrance of Things Past (from Shakespeare). The "little phrase," we are told, comes
from a sonata by one Vintueil, a fictional composer believed by various scholars to be modelled,
respectively, on Franck, or Faure, or Saint-seans, or Lodyzhensky, or some amalgamation of
the above.
In any case the debate is now over: In Ofterdingen's world there is no Proust, but Vinteuil is
real, and I can prove it - I have found the sonata!
This one - movement work, a trio for flute, viola and piano, contains, as its principal theme, a
phrase in whose recurrences we find just that mixture of plasticity and mutability so enchanting
to Swann, and which becomes entangled with his love for Odette. Without attempting to
dissect the score (for a flightless butterfly is but a husk of beauty) we may note, among the
elements of Vinteuil's musical language, a suppleness of rhythm as well as a preference for a
pair of scales whose mutual relation is akin to that which exists between the major and relative
minor in our tonal system. The principal scale, known to us as the acoustic, features both
"Lydian" fourth and "Mixolydian" seventh degrees (A, B, C #, D#, E, F#, G), while its
complement comprises the same pitch collection but centers on F#, yielding lower Phrygian and
upper Dorian tetrachords. (Of course such descriptions by comparison with the norms of
our world offer a distorted perspective. The same holds true for the structure of the work
which, instead of attempting to squeeze into sonata - allegro principles, we can see as exhibiting
just that proportion of unity and variety which allows each part to contribute to its organic
wholeness.
Now, according to Proust, the encounter with this music effects a change in his protagonist:
Swann found in himself, in the memory of this phrase...the presence of one of those invisible
realities in which he had ceased to believe, but to which, as though the music had had upon the
moral bareness from which he was suffering a sort of recreative influence, he was conscious
once again of a desire, almost, indeed of the power to consecrate his life.
Yet this does not happen, and ultimately Swann's infatuation with the woman is revealed as
illusory and impermanent; neither does his life undergo any lasting transformation, leading us to
ask: Is beauty a delusion, art a sham, a drug, a decadent indulgence? Or, despite Swann's
failures, can art be redemptive, or prophetic, can it endow the ephemera of experience with
permanence and form, and through this transmutation make possible the search for meaning?
Can art, can love, improve us?
Well, speaking from experience (to answer only the last question) I would say that the madness
of love that takes us by surprise and turns our lives upside down, transforming the ordinary
world, rendering us strangers to ourselves and virtual newborns in the world - such a love is
unnatural, a product of the exacerbated imagination, and will end badly, leaving us as it did
Swann, wondering how it ever began. On the other hand, the ways of a philanderer are
cynical and vicious; gradually they erode the soul. So a middle course, befitting us humans
(hybrid beings, adrift between the lower realms of matter and the empyrean of spirit) seems
best, where love is cultivated over time - perhaps a lifetime - through a relationship rooted in
attraction, but gaining depth through shared experience, and allowing, with sympathy and
humor, for inevitable limitations. (My darling would be miffed were she to read this: the fact is
she isn't interested enough to bother - and that's what I mean about accepting limitations.)
As for me, I like to imagine Vinteuil, years after conceiving the sonata, remembering its genesis
on a fine summer morning at, say, Montauk (where the sky bends down to meet the shore and
the sea), recalling how he awoke after a night of thunderstorms and strolled along the glistening
boulevard, and realizing, as he recollects, that "everything lovely in this memory comes not from
the place itself but from its association with the birth of that melody."
Which brings us to Proust and the definition of art as translation - in this case the translation
of impressions of a beach resort into tones, rhythms and textures, according to which the
notion of artistic "invention" collapses into that of the discovery of correspondences.
...Except that the best translation is the least accurate, and vice versa, or so it seems. For
instance, when I travel (be it abroad or, recently, to neighboring heavenly bodies in our solar
system - see What We Found on Europa) I customarily keep a detailed diary which I refine
from hastily sketched impressions to the transparent prose expected of me. Yet with regret do
I observe each time how the effort to express clearly what I have seen has robbed me of what I
most urgently sought in it: a sense of the reality I lived. Art is not a mirror of life but a stylized
representation.
...Unless we insist upon the nebulous, the confused, the inexplicable, as in that passage where
Proust's Narrator driving along a country road, finds his carriage approaching a cluster of
trees, whose appearance grants him the tantalizing pleasure of a recognition that cannot be
placed, though he remains convinced that a full apprehension of the reality abiding behind their
appearance, alone in the world, would enable him to "begin to live a true life." He wonders
whether the apparition comes "from years already remote," or whether it should be numbered
among "those dream landscapes beneath the outer appearance of which" he was "dimly aware
of there being something more," or whether, in fact, he had never seen the trees before, in
which case they might "conceal beneath their surface...a meaning as obscure...as is the distant
past."
Remarkably, the scene does not resolve to clarity. The carriage passes, the trees recede, and
the narrator seems to discern "the helpless anguish of a beloved person who has lost the gift of
speech."
Is music like that? People assume composers "express themselves" through the craft, but fail to
appreciate that the materials of music are potent, and exist outside our creative endeavors.
The composer stands in relation to his materials rather as a magician to his potions: he has
learned, to some degree, to harness the dangerous stuff, but he can't be credited with making
magic - it's in the materials. I think that, in Vinteuil's world, if there were a Proust to read and he
read him, coming upon the description of his sonata with which this article began, he'd exclaim:
"Upon my word! I never imagined any such thing. I was just trying to make a nice melody."
Meanwhile, in this. our world, a final irony remains: In this, our fallen world (world of mutual
suspicion and lies) so long as I insist on the existence of Vinteuil I stand accused of "making up
stories" and of suffering from acute cultural nostalgia, of being a bone-headed dreamer with his
head in the past, whereas were I to come right out and admit to the authorship of our lovely
Trio, my use, in the early 21st century, of unabashed lyricism and sweet triads would be
applauded as the height of Post - Modernist technique. If I had Proust's powers I'd silence
my critics with a satire, thinly guised, featuring a certain ponderous, double-chinned colleague
who would be well advised to spend less time in the faculty snack bar and more in the library.
Ah! better to turn from such trivia to the Trio of Vinteuil, in the belief that, even if music's
meaning will never become for us wholly clear, even if the pursuit of beauty leads us not toward
the light but into mystery and deepening darkness, even if on this earth there's no
transcendence, and beyond it, no immortal life for the soul, even if we sing and love in the
shadow of oblivion, it is better to sing and to love than to be silent and alone - to sing like
Verlaine's nightingale, who seems to raise his voice in the last, tragic bars of Vinteuil's Trio, in
the song of our despair.